4.7 Article

Tariquidar inhibits P-glycoprotein drug efflux but activates ATPase activity by blocking transition to an open conformation

期刊

BIOCHEMICAL PHARMACOLOGY
卷 92, 期 4, 页码 558-566

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.bcp.2014.10.006

关键词

Tariquidar; Inhibitor P-glycoprotein drug pump; Cysteine cross-linking; Rescue of folding mutants

资金

  1. Cystic Fibrosis Canada
  2. Canadian Institutes for Health Research
  3. Canadian Chair in Membrane Biology

向作者/读者索取更多资源

P-glycoprotein (P-gp, ABCB1) is a drug pump that confers multidrug resistance. Inhibition of P-gp would improve chemotherapy. Tariquidar is a potent P-gp inhibitor but its mechanism is unknown. Here, we tested our prediction that tariquidar inhibits P-gp cycling between the open and closed states during the catalytic cycle. Transition of P-gp to an open state can be monitored in intact cells using reporter cysteines introduced into extracellular loops 1 (A80C) and 4 (R741C). Residues A80C/R741C come close enough (<7 angstrom) to spontaneously cross-link in the open conformation (<7 A) but are widely separated (>30 angstrom) in the closed conformation. Cross-linking of A80C/R741C can be readily detected because it causes the mutant protein to migrate slower on SOS-PAGE gels. We tested whether drug substrates or inhibitors could inhibit cross-linking of the mutant. It was found that only tariquidar blocked A80C/R741C cross-linking. Tariquidar was also a more potent pharmacological chaperone than other P-gp substrates/modulators such as cyclosporine A. Only tariquidar promoted maturation of misprocessed mutant F804D to yield mature P-gp. Tariquidar interacted with the transmembrane domains because it could rescue a misprocessed truncation mutant lacking the nucleotide-binding domains. These results show that tariquidar is a potent pharmacological chaperone and inhibits P-gp drug efflux by blocking transition to the open state during the catalytic cycle. (C) 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据