4.2 Article

Highly conserved sequences flank avirulence genes:: isolation of novel avirulence genes from Pseudomonas syringae pv. pisi

期刊

MICROBIOLOGY-SGM
卷 147, 期 -, 页码 1171-1182

出版社

SOC GENERAL MICROBIOLOGY
DOI: 10.1099/00221287-147-5-1171

关键词

Pseudomonas syringae; conserved DNA sequences; avr; plasmid; rulAB

向作者/读者索取更多资源

DNA sequences flanking two avr genes (avrPpiA1 and avrPpiB1) from Pseudomonas syringae pv. pisi show a high degree of similarity. Specific primers designed from the conserved regions were used in PCR amplifications with ail P. syringae pv. pisi races. As well as amplifying the expected avrPpiA- and avrPpiB-containing fragments, two additional fragments were amplified: one contained a single open reading frame (ORF1) and was found in races of genomic group II (2, 3A, 4A and 6); the second fragment contained two open reading frames (ORF2 and ORF3), separated by 658 nt, and was detected in all races. All three ORFs had G+C ratios (46.9-48 mol%) that were significantly less than that for P, syringae and each was preceded by a potential hrp box promoter. In P. syringae pv. phaseolicola, ORF1 and ORF2 each elicited a strong non-host hypersensitive reaction on bean leaves; ORF1 was designated avrPpiG, the product of which had strong similarity to AvrRxv, AvrBsT and YopP, ORF2 was identical to a gene, designated avrPpiC, previously isolated from P, syringae pv. pisi race 5. ORF3 was always found in association with avrPpiC and both were detected in a wide range of P, syringae pathovars. In contrast, avrPpiG was only detected in strains of P, syringae pv. pisi genomic group II and P. syringae pv, coronafaciens (ICMP 3113). In P. syringae pv. pisi, avrPpiG was plasmid-borne and avrPpiC and ORF3 were chromosomal. This conservation of flanking sequences has implications for the horizontal transfer of avirulence and virulence genes, suggesting that specific regions of the bacterial genome act as sites for their integration/excision.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据