4.8 Article

Design of Stable and Powerful Nanobiocatalysts, Based on Enzyme Laccase Immobilized on Self-Assembled 3D Graphene/Polymer Composite Hydrogels

期刊

ACS APPLIED MATERIALS & INTERFACES
卷 7, 期 25, 页码 14104-14112

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acsami.5b03325

关键词

graphene hydrogels; graphene 3D monoliths; porous monoliths; self-assembled graphene structures; laccase; nanobiocatalyst; Remazol Brilliant Blue R

资金

  1. Basque Government [CV IT373-10, IE14-393]
  2. NATO [SfP 984399]
  3. Diputacion Foral de Gipuzkoa [Exp. 55/14]
  4. University of the Basque Country UPV/EHU [UFI11/56]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Graphene-based materials appear as a suitable answer to the demand for novel nanostructured materials for effective nanobiocatalytic systems design. In this work, a design of stable and efficient nanobiocatalysts made of enzyme laccase immobilized on composite hydrogels [reduced graphene oxide (rGO)/polymer] is presented. The composite hydrogel supports were synthesized by self-assembly of graphene oxide nanoplatelets in the frame of a polymer latex matrix, where the polymer nanoparticles were adsorbed onto the GO surface, creating hybrid nanoplatelets. These hybrids self-assembled when ascorbic acid was added as a GO reducing agent and formed three-dimensional porous structures, greatly swollen with water, e.g., the composite hydrogels. The hydrogels were used as a support for covalent immobilization of the laccase. The performance of the nanobiocatalysts was tested in the oxidative degradation of the recalcitrant synthetic dye Remazol Brilliant Blue R in aqueous solutions. The biocatalysts showed strong dye discoloration ability and high stability as they preserved their catalytic action in four successive batches of dye degradation. The presented biocatalysts offer possibilities for overcoming the main disadvantages of the enzyme catalysts (fragile nature, high cost, and high loading of the enzyme), which would lead to a step forward toward their industrial application.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据