4.7 Article

Nuclear expression of human apurinic/apyrimidinic endonuclease (HAP1/REF-1) in head-and-neck cancer is associated with resistance to chemoradiotherapy and poor outcome

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/S0360-3016(00)01561-3

关键词

HAP1; p53; radiotherapy; chemotherapy; head-and-neck cancer

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purpose: HAP1/Ref-1 endonuclease is involved in the repair of DNA strand breaks and in the activation of DNA binding of several transcription factors. HAP1 is also a potent activator of wild type p53, It therefore has multiple possible roles in the response of human cancer to radiotherapy and chemotherapy. Methods and Materials: The nuclear expression of HAP1 and p53 proteins was studied by immunohistochemistry in paraffin-embedded material from 95 patients with locally advanced squamous cell head-and-neck cancer (HNC) treated with radical radiotherapy (38 cases with induction platinum-based chemotherapy and 57 with concurrent platinum chemoradiotherapy), Results: HAP1 was present in the nuclei of normal epithelium and stromal cells. Loss of HAP1 nuclear expression was frequently noted in cancer cells. Tumors with high HAP1 nuclear expression (% of positive cells > mean; mean = 11%) were of good differentiation (p = 0.06) and presented frequently with advanced nodal disease (p 0.01). High nuclear HAP1 expression was significantly associated with poor complete response rate (p = 0.00001), shorter local relapse-free interval (p < 0.0001), and poorer survival (p < 0.0008), HAP1 nuclear reactivity was inversely associated with p53 nuclear accumulation (p = 0.003). The inverse correlation between HAP1 expression and prognosis was independent of p53 status. Conclusion: HAP1 nuclear expression in HNC is inversely associated with p53 nuclear accumulation and directly related to resistance to chemoradiotherapy and poor survival. Further clinical investigation is required to confirm these findings. (C) 2001 Elsevier Science Inc.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据