4.6 Article

Agonism, Antagonism, and Inverse Agonism Bias at the Ghrelin Receptor Signaling

期刊

JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL CHEMISTRY
卷 290, 期 45, 页码 27021-27039

出版社

AMER SOC BIOCHEMISTRY MOLECULAR BIOLOGY INC
DOI: 10.1074/jbc.M115.659250

关键词

-

资金

  1. INSERM
  2. CNRS
  3. Universite de Montpellier, Agence Nationale de la Recherche Grant [PCV08-323163]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: GHS-R1a activates multiple signaling pathways mediating feeding and addictive behaviors. Results: Some GHS-R1a ligands activate G(q) but not G(i/o) and fail to recruit beta-arrestin2; others act as selective inverse agonists at G(q) compared with G(13). Conclusion: Synthetic ligands can selectively activate or reverse G(q)-dependent signaling at GHS-R1a. Significance: Ligand-biased signaling can be exploited for the development of selective drugs to treat GHS-R1a-mediated disorders. The G protein-coupled receptor GHS-R1a mediates ghrelin-induced growth hormone secretion, food intake, and reward-seeking behaviors. GHS-R1a signals through G(q), G(i/o), G(13), and arrestin. Biasing GHS-R1a signaling with specific ligands may lead to the development of more selective drugs to treat obesity or addiction with minimal side effects. To delineate ligand selectivity at GHS-R1a signaling, we analyzed in detail the efficacy of a panel of synthetic ligands activating the different pathways associated with GHS-R1a in HEK293T cells. Besides beta-arrestin2 recruitment and ERK1/2 phosphorylation, we monitored activation of a large panel of G protein subtypes using a bioluminescence resonance energy transfer-based assay with G protein-activation biosensors. We first found that unlike full agonists, G(q) partial agonists were unable to trigger beta-arrestin2 recruitment and ERK1/2 phosphorylation. Using G protein-activation biosensors, we then demonstrated that ghrelin promoted activation of G(q), G(i1), G(i2), G(i3), G(oa), G(ob), and G(13) but not G(s) and G(12). Besides, we identified some GHS-R1a ligands that preferentially activated G(q) and antagonized ghrelin-mediated G(i)/G(o) activation. Finally, we unambiguously demonstrated that in addition to G(q), GHS-R1a also promoted constitutive activation of G(13). Importantly, we identified some ligands that were selective inverse agonists toward G(q) but not of G(13). This demonstrates that bias at GHS-R1a signaling can occur not only with regard to agonism but also to inverse agonism. Our data, combined with other in vivo studies, may facilitate the design of drugs selectively targeting individual signaling pathways to treat only the therapeutically relevant function.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据