4.7 Article

Alteration of prolyl oligopeptidase and activated α-2-macroglobulin in multiple sclerosis subtypes and in the clinically isolated syndrome

期刊

BIOCHEMICAL PHARMACOLOGY
卷 85, 期 12, 页码 1783-1794

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.bcp.2013.04.018

关键词

Multiple sclerosis; Prolyl oligopeptidase; alpha-2-Macroglobulin; Inflammation; Cell signalling; Biomarkers

资金

  1. European Commission [FP7-Health-F2-2008-223077]
  2. Marie Curie Actions grant [FP7-PEOPLE-2009-IEF-254127]
  3. Biocentrum Helsinki
  4. Biocenter Finland

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Prolyl oligopeptidase (PREP) has been considered as a drug target for the treatment of neurodegenerative diseases. In plasma, PREP has been found altered in several disorders of the central nervous system including multiple sclerosis (MS). Oxidative stress and the levels of an endogenous plasma PREP inhibitor have been proposed to decrease PREP activity in MS. In this work, we measured the circulating levels of PREP in patients suffering of relapsing remitting (RR), secondary progressive (SP), primary progressive (PP) MS, and in subjects with clinically isolated syndrome (CIS). We found a significantly lower PREP activity in plasma of RRMS as well as in PPMS patients and a trend to reduced activity in subjects diagnosed with CIS, compared to controls. No signs of oxidative inactivation of PREP, and no correlation with the endogenous PREP inhibitor, identified as activated alpha-2-macroglobulin (alpha M-2*), were observed in any of the patients studied. However, a significant decrease of alpha M-2* was recorded in MS. In cell cultures, we found that PREP specifically stimulates immune active cells possibly by modifying the levels of fibrinogen beta, thymosin beta 4, and collagen. Our results open new lines of research on the role of PREP and alpha M-2* in MS, aiming to relate them to the diagnosis and prognosis of this devastating disease. (C) 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据