4.5 Article

Diet-induced ketosis increases monocarboxylate transporter (MCT1) levels in rat brain

期刊

NEUROCHEMISTRY INTERNATIONAL
卷 38, 期 6, 页码 519-527

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/S0197-0186(00)00102-9

关键词

monocarboxylate transporters; MCT1; GLUT1; brain; endothelium; pericytel; astrocyte; ketogenic diet

资金

  1. NINDS NIH HHS [NS32754] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Monocarboxylate transporter (MCT1) levels in brains of adult Long-Evans rats on a high-fat (ketogenic) diet were investigated using light and electron microscopic immunocytochemical methods. Rats given the ketogenic diet (91% fat and 9% protein) for up to 6 weeks had increased levels of the monocarboxylate transporter MCT1 (and of the glucose transporter GLUT1) in brain endothelial cells and neuropil compared to rats on a standard diet. In ketonemic rats, electron microscopic immunogold methods revealed an 8-fold greater MCT1 labeling in the brain endothelial cells at 4 weeks. Abluminal endothelial membranes were twice as heavily labeled as luminal membranes. In controls. luminal and abluminal labeling was not significantly different. The endothelial cytoplasmic compartment was sparsely labeled (<8% of total endothelial labeling) in all brains. Neuropil MCT1 staining was more intense throughout the brain in ketonemic rats, especially in neuropil of the molecular layer of the cerebellum as revealed by avidin-biotin immunocytochemistry. This study demonstrates that adult rats retain the capacity to upregulate brain MCT1 levels. Furthermore. their I;rains react to a diet that increases monocarboxylate levels in the blood by enhancing their capability to take up both monocarboxylates (MCT1 upregulation) and glucose (GLUT1 upregulation). This may have important implications for delivery of fuel to the brain under stressful and pathological conditions. such as epilepsy and GLUT1 deficiency syndrome. (C) 2001 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据