4.6 Article

IL-12 antagonism enhances apoptotic death of T cells within hepatic allografts from Flt3 ligand-treated donors and promotes graft acceptance

期刊

JOURNAL OF IMMUNOLOGY
卷 166, 期 9, 页码 5619-5628

出版社

AMER ASSOC IMMUNOLOGISTS
DOI: 10.4049/jimmunol.166.9.5619

关键词

-

资金

  1. NIDDK NIH HHS [DK 49745, DK 29961] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Mouse livers are accepted across MHC barriers and induce donor-specific tolerance without immunosuppressive therapy. By contrast, livers from donors treated with Flt3 ligand, which dramatically increases hepatic interstitial dendritic cells, are rejected acutely (median survival time 5 days). This switch from tolerance to rejection is associated with a marked reduction in apoptotic activity of graft-infiltrating cells. We hypothesized that IL-12 production by enhanced numbers of donor APC might inhibit apoptosis, promote expansion of Th1 cells, and play a key role in liver rejection. Therefore, C3H (H2(k)) recipients of liver grafts from Flt3 ligand-treated BIO donors were given neutralizing anti-IL-12 mAb (200 or 500 mug) on days 0 and 2 after transplant. Graft survival was markedly prolonged at the higher mAb dose, with 50% of grafts surviving > 100 days. This effect was associated with reductions in IFN-T gene transcripts within the graft-infiltrating cell population and with reductions in circulating IFN-gamma and IL-10 levels, donor-specific CTL and NK cell activities, and circulating alloantibody levels. At the same time, there were marked increases in apoptotic (TUNEL+) CD4(+) and especially CD8(+) cells, both within the grafts and in spleens of anti-IL-12 mAb-treated mice. In vitro, exogenous IL-12 inhibited apoptotic death induced in naive allogeneic T cells by liver nonparenchymal cells. These findings suggest that suppression of rejection by IL-12 antagonism, linked to restoration of apoptotic activity within the peripheral alloreactive T cell population, is important for liver allograft survival and tolerance induction.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据