4.5 Article

Low pO2 and β-estradiol induce VEGF in MCF-7 and MCF-7-5C cells:: Relationship to in vivo hypoxia

期刊

BREAST CANCER RESEARCH AND TREATMENT
卷 67, 期 1, 页码 51-60

出版社

KLUWER ACADEMIC PUBL
DOI: 10.1023/A:1010662905549

关键词

angiogenesis; hypoxia; MCF-7; VEGF

类别

资金

  1. NCI NIH HHS [R01 CA75285] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Previous work from this laboratory demonstrated that MCF-7 breast carcinoma cells grown in nude mice contained minimal hypoxia but that tamoxifen treatment of these tumors resulted in increased hypoxia (Evans S. et al., Cancer Research, 1997). These findings led to studies exploring the link between estrogen signaling and tumor oxygenation and determining the role of VEGF in this process. The stimulation of estrogen-dependent MCF-7 breast carcinoma cells in vitro with beta -estradiol resulted in a two-fold induction of VEGF mRNA and 1.3-2-fold increase in protein, similar to what was observed when these cells were exposed to 0.1% oxygen. Furthermore, the two stimuli given together had an additive effect on (increasing) VEGF expression, suggesting that the combination of hypoxia and estrogen may be important in upregulating VEGF in some breast cancers. Estrogen-independent MCF-7-5C cells, developed by growing MCF-7 cells in long-term culture in estrogen-free media, were also studied. Using EF5, a fluorinated 2-nitroimidazole which localizes to hypoxic cells, MCF-7-5C tumors grown in nude mice were found to contain lower pO(2) levels and more hypoxic regions than similarly grown MCF-7 tumors. We tested the hypothesis that this might be the result of defective expression of VEGF in MCF-7-5C cells in response to beta -estradiol and/or hypoxia. However, MCF-7-5C and MCF-7 cells showed a similar induction of VEGF in vitro in response to either beta -estradiol or hypoxia. Therefore, although these two cell lines grown as tumors have substantial differences in the presence and patterns of hypoxia, this could not be explained by a difference in VEGF induction.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据