4.7 Article

Opioidergic mechanisms underlying the actions of Vitex agnus-castus L.

期刊

BIOCHEMICAL PHARMACOLOGY
卷 81, 期 1, 页码 170-177

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.bcp.2010.09.013

关键词

Pain; Botanical; Plant; Premenstrual syndrome; Menopause

资金

  1. NIH [AT002406, AT003647, AT003476, AT000155, F31AT002669]
  2. NATIONAL CENTER FOR COMPLEMENTARY & ALTERNATIVE MEDICINE [K07AT003647] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  3. NATIONAL CENTER FOR COMPLEMENTARY &ALTERNATIVE MEDICINE [R21AT002406, R21AT003476, F31AT002669] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  4. National Center for Complementary & Integrative Health [P50AT000155] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Vitex agnus-castus (VAC) has been used since ancient Greek times and has been shown clinically to be effective for the treatment of pre-menstrual syndrome. However, its mechanism of action has only been partially determined. Compounds, fractions, and extracts isolated from VAC were used in this study to thoroughly investigate possible opioidergic activity. First, an extract of VAC was found to bind and activate mu- and delta-, but not kappa-opioid receptor subtypes (MOR, DOR, and KOR respectively). The extract was then resuspended in 10% methanol and partitioned sequentially with petroleum ether, CHCl3, and EtOAc to form four fractions including a water fraction. The highest affinity for MOR was concentrated in the CHCl3 fraction, whereas the highest affinity for DOR was found in the CHCl3 and EtOAc fractions. The petroleum ether fraction had the highest agonist activity at MOR and DOR. Several flavonoids from VAC were found to bind to both MOR and DOR in a dose-dependent manner; however only casticin, a marker compound for genus Vitex, was found to have agonist activity selective for DOR at high concentrations. These results suggest VAC may exert its therapeutic effects through the activation of MOR, DOR, but not KOR. (C) 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据