4.5 Article

Safety and ethics of bronchoscopy and endobronchial biopsy in difficult asthma

期刊

ARCHIVES OF DISEASE IN CHILDHOOD
卷 84, 期 5, 页码 423-426

出版社

BRITISH MED JOURNAL PUBL GROUP
DOI: 10.1136/adc.84.5.423

关键词

difficult asthma; endobronchial biopsy; bronchoscopy

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Aim-To investigate the safety of bronchoscopy and endobronchial biopsy in children with difficult asthma, and discuss the ethical issues associated with the procedure. Methods-A three year prospective observational study was performed in two tertiary paediatric respiratory centres specialising in the management of children with difficult asthma. A total of 48 children with difficult asthma and 35 nonasthmatic children were studied. Results-Flexible bronchoscopy was performed under general anaesthesia in 38 children with difficult asthma, and rigid bronchoscopy was performed in 10, following a two week course of prednisolone. Endobronchial biopsy was performed in 47 patients. Perioperative complications occurred in one asthmatic undergoing flexible bronchoscopy (desaturation) and in two undergoing rigid bronchoscopy (desaturation in one, and bronchospasm and desaturation in one). There were no cases of significant bleeding or pneumothorax among the asthmatics. flexible bronchoscopy was performed in 35 nonasthmatic patients with a variety of clinical indications. The total number of perioperative complications was greater in the non-asthmatics undergoing flexible bronchoscopy than in the asthmatics (17 complications in 35 children versus one in 38). Fever requiring hospital admission was documented in two asthmatics following bronchoscopy. Four asthmatics reported an increase in symptoms in the week following bronchoscopy. Conclusions-Bronchoscopy and endobronchial biopsy under general anaesthesia can be performed safely in children with difficult asthma, when the bronchoscopist and anaesthetist are suitably trained. The procedure is acceptable to the families involved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据