4.7 Article Proceedings Paper

Alpha9 nicotinic acetylcholine receptors and the treatment of pain

期刊

BIOCHEMICAL PHARMACOLOGY
卷 78, 期 7, 页码 693-702

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.bcp.2009.05.020

关键词

alpha-Conotoxin Vc1.1; alpha-Contoxin RgIA; Pain; Alpha9 nicotinic; GABA-B

资金

  1. NIGMS NIH HHS [P01 GM048677, GM48677, P01 GM048677-160012] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIMH NIH HHS [R29 MH053631, MH53631, N01MH32004, R01 MH053631, R01 MH053631-14] Funding Source: Medline
  3. NINDS NIH HHS [R01 NS048158-04, NS048158, R01 NS048158] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Chronic pain is a vexing worldwide problem that causes substantial disability and consumes significant medical resources. Although there are numerous analgesic medications, these work through a small set of molecular mechanisms. Even when these medications are used in combination, substantial amounts of pain often remain. It is therefore highly desirable to develop treatments that work through distinct mechanisms of action. While agonists of nicotinic acetylcholine receptors (nAChRs) have been intensively studied, new data suggest a role for selective antagonists of nAChRs. alpha-Conotoxins are small peptides used offensively by carnivorous marine snails known as Conus. A subset of these peptides known as alpha-conotoxins RgIA and Vc1.1 produces both acute and long lasting analgesia. In addition, these peptides appear to accelerate the recovery of function after nerve injury, possibly through immune mediated mechanisms. Pharmacological analysis indicates that RgIA and Vc1.1 are selective antagonists of alpha 9 alpha 10 nAChRs. A recent study also reported that these alpha 9 alpha 10 antagonists are also potent GABA-B agonists. In the current study, we were unable to detect RgIA or Vc1.1 binding to or action on cloned GABA-B receptors expressed in HEK cells or Xenopus oocytes. We review the background, findings and implications of use of compounds that act on alpha 9* nAChRs.(1) (C) 2009 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据