4.7 Review

Wild-type p53 in cancer cells: When a guardian turns into a blackguard

期刊

BIOCHEMICAL PHARMACOLOGY
卷 77, 期 1, 页码 11-20

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.bcp.2008.08.030

关键词

Wild-type p53; Cancer; Growth arrest; Apoptosis; Repair

资金

  1. Deutsche Krebshilfe
  2. Fonds der Chemischen Industrie
  3. EC
  4. Freie und Hansestadt Hamburg
  5. Bundesministerium fur Gesundheit

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The tumor suppressor p53 controls a broad range of cellular responses. Induction of a transient (cell cycle arrest) or a permanent (senescence) block of cell proliferation, or the activation of cell death pathways in response to genotoxic stress comprise the major arms of the survival-death axis governed by p53. Due to these biological properties, inactivation of p53 is a crucial step in tumor development and progression, reflected by the high incidence of TP53 mutations in different types of human cancers. The remarkable potency of p53 in suppressing tumorigenic outgrowth has promoted the expectation that tumor cells expressing wild-type p53 (wtp53) should be more prone to elimination by cytotoxic treatments than tumor cells expressing mutant p53 (mutp53) with defunct wtp53 activities. However, recent findings yielded somewhat unexpected insights concerning the preponderance of the survival-promoting effects of wtp53 in cancer cells, a rather undesired property from the therapeutic point of view. In this commentary we will discuss the possibility that the developmentally established distinct patterns of wtp53 mediated responses in different tissues are an important factor in determining the ultimate outcome of cellular responses mediated by wtp53 in different types of tumor cells, with a particular focus on the divergent impact of wtp53 in malignant tumors of the central nervous system. We infer that a selective gain of pro-survival functions of wtp53 in cancer cells will confer a survival advantage that counteracts tumor therapy. (C) 2008 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据