4.7 Article

Impact of diabetic nephropathy on pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic properties of insulin in type 1 diabetic patients

期刊

DIABETES CARE
卷 24, 期 5, 页码 886-890

出版社

AMER DIABETES ASSOC
DOI: 10.2337/diacare.24.5.886

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

OBJECTIVE - To quantify pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties of regular insulin anti insulin lispro in type 1 diabetic patients with and without overt diabetic nephropathy. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS - In this double-blind, two-way cross-over, euglycemic (5 mmol/l) glucose clamp study, we investigated the metabolic response to subcutaneous injections of regular insulin and insulin lispro (0.2 U/kg) in 12 type 1 diabetic patients with overt diabetic nephropathy (proteinuria >500 mg/24 h and/or serum creatinine >1.5 mg/dl; NP group) and in a control group of 12 type 1 diabetic patients with normal renal function (DC group). RESULTS - Peak plasma free insulin levels with insulin lispro (359 [NP] vs. 254 pmol/l [DC])were higher anti rime to maximal insulin concentrations (85 [NP] vs. 99 min [DC]) shorter than with regular insulin (213 [NP] vs. 144 pmol/l [DC]; 118 [NP] vs. 153 min [DC]) in both patient groups. Overall insulin levels for regular insulin and for insulin lispro were higher in patients with overt diabetic nephropathy compared with control patients. Time to maximal metabolic effect was shorter with insulin lispro than with regular insulin in both patient groups (102 vs. 191 min [NP]; 105 vs. 172 min [DC]). The overall metabolic effect of regular insulin but not of insulin lispro was lower in patients with diabetic nephropathy than in diabetic control patients (967 vs. 1,510 mg/kg, respectively). CONCLUSIONS - Although insulin levels are higher in patients with overt diabetic nephropathy, the metabolic response to regular insulin is reduced. Insulin lispro maintains its characteristic pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties in patients with overt diabetic nephropathy.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据