4.7 Article

New mutations inactivating transferrin receptor 2 in hemochromatosis type 3

期刊

BLOOD
卷 97, 期 9, 页码 2555-2560

出版社

AMER SOC HEMATOLOGY
DOI: 10.1182/blood.V97.9.2555

关键词

-

资金

  1. Telethon [TGM06S01] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Hereditary hemochromatosis usually results from C282Y homozygosity in the HFE gene on chromosome 6p. Recently, a new type of hemochromatosis (HFE3) has been characterized in 2 unrelated Italian families with a disorder linked to 7q. Patients with HFE3 have transferrin receptor 2 (TFR2) inactivated by a homozygous nonsense mutation (Y250X). Here the identification of 2 new TFR2 mutations is reported. In a large inbred family from Campania, a frameshift mutation (84-88 insC) in exon 2 that causes a premature stop codon (E60X) is identified. In a single patient with nonfamilial hemochromatosis, a T-->A transversion (T515A), which causes a Methionine-->Lysine substitution at position 172 of the protein (M172K), has been characterized. TFR2 gene gives origin to 2 alternatively spliced transcripts-->the alpha -transcript, which may encode a transmembrane protein, and the beta -transcript, a shorter, possibly intracellular variant. Based on their positions, the effects of the identified mutations on the 2 TFR2forms are expected to differ. Y250X inactivates both transcripts, whereas E60X inactivates only the alpha -form, M172K has a complex effect: it causes a missense in the alpha -form, but it may also prevent the beta -form production because it affects its putative initiation codon. Analysis of the clinical phenotype of 13 HFE3 homozygotes characterized at the molecular level has shown a variable severity, from nonexpressing patients to severe clinical complications. The identification of new mutations of TFR2 confirms that this gene is associated with iron overload and offers a tool for molecular diagnosis in patients without HFE mutations. (Blood, 2001;97:2555-2560) (C) 2001 by The American Society of Hematology.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据