4.7 Review

Dopamine cell degeneration induced by intraventricular administration of 6-hydroxydopamine in the rat:: Similarities with cell loss in Parkinson's disease

期刊

EXPERIMENTAL NEUROLOGY
卷 169, 期 1, 页码 163-181

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1006/exnr.2000.7624

关键词

dopamine; 6-hydroxydopamine; Parkinson's disease; animal model; vulnerability

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In an attempt to find a convenient rat model to study cell vulnerability in Parkinson's disease, we have investigated the cell-loss profile in different midbrain dopaminergic nuclei and subnuclei of rats injected with 6-hydroxydopamine (6-OHDA) in the third ventricle. Following administration of different doses (5-1000 mug) of 6-OHDA, motor behavior was evaluated and tyrosine hydroxylase-immunostained neurons were counted in the A8 group and different subdivisions of A9 and A10 groups. Animals developed hypokinesia, repetitive chewing movements, and catalepsia. Signs of cell degeneration were evident from the first day after injection, reaching the definitive pattern at the end of the first week. There was a similar degeneration in both brain sides, the A9 group showing the highest degree of cell-loss, followed by A8 and A10 groups. In the A9 group, the degeneration mostly affected those subgroups located in its ventral, lateral, and posterior regions. In the A10 group the degeneration mainly affected the parabrachial pigmented nucleus, the paranigral nucleus and the ventral tegmental area. This topographic pattern of degeneration is very similar to that previously described in Parkinson's disease, suggesting that this model may be a useful tool in the study of the cell vulnerability mechanisms in this neurodegenerative disorder. In addition, our results also showed that small dopaminergic neurons are more resistant to degeneration than the large ones. In some DA subgroups, the cells that contained calbindin but not calretinin were less vulnerable to the neurotoxic effect of 6-OHDA. (C) 2001 Academic Press.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据