4.5 Article

Comparative xenobiotic metabolism between Tg.AC and p53+/- genetically altered mice and their respective wild types

期刊

TOXICOLOGICAL SCIENCES
卷 61, 期 1, 页码 54-61

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/toxsci/61.1.54

关键词

transgenic mouse; Tg.AC mouse; p53+/-; mouse; metabolism; cytochrome P450; GST-alpha; ethoxyquin; benzene; methacrylonitrile

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The use of transgenic animals, such as v-Ha-ras activated (Tg.AC) and p53+/- mice, offers great promise for a rapid and more sensitive assay for chemical carcinogenicity. Some carcinogens are metabolically activated; therefore, it is critical that the altered genome of either of these model systems does not compromise their capability and capacity for metabolism of xenobiotics. The present work tests the generally held assumption that xenobiotic metabolism in the Tg.AC and p53+/- mouse is not inherently different from that of the respective wild type, the FVB/N and C57BL/6 mouse, by comparing each genotype's ability to metabolize benzene, ethoxyquin, or methacrylonitrile. Use of these representative substrates offers the opportunity to examine arene oxide formation, aromatic ring opening, hydroxylation, epoxidation. O-deethylation, and a number of conjugation reactions. Mice were treated by gavage with C-14-labeled parent compound. excreta were collected, and elimination routes and rates, as well as C-14-derived metabolite profiles in urine, were compared between relevant treatment groups. Results of this study indicated that metabolism of the 3 parent compounds was not appreciably altered between either FVB/N and Tg.AC mise or C57BL/6 and p53+/-mice. Further, expression of CYP1A2, CYP2E1, CYP3A, and GST-alpha in liver of naive genetically altered mice was similar to that of corresponding wild-type mice. Thus, these results suggest that the inherent ability of Tg.AC and p53+/- mice to metabolize xenobiotics is not compromised by their altered genomes and would not be a factor in data interpretation of toxicity studies using either transgenic mouse line.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据