4.6 Article

Glioblastoma multiforme occurring in a patient treated with gamma knife surgery -: Case report and review of the literature

期刊

JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY
卷 94, 期 5, 页码 816-821

出版社

AMER ASSOC NEUROLOGICAL SURGEONS
DOI: 10.3171/jns.2001.94.5.0816

关键词

stereotactic radiosurgery; gamma knife; radiation-induced turner; glioblastoma multiforme; vestibular schwannoma

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Stereotactic radiosurgery is being increasingly advocated as the primary modality for treatment of vestibular schwannomas (VS). This modality has been shown to arrest tumor growth, with few associated short-term morbidities, and with possibly better hearing and facial ner-ve preservation rates than microsurgery. Radiation-induced oncogenesis has long been recognized. although stereotactic radiosurgery de novo induction of a secondary tumor has never been clearly described. The authors report on a patient with a VS who did not have neurofibromatosis Type 2 and who underwent gamma knife surgery (GKS). This patient required microsurgical removal of the VS within 8 months because of development of a tumor cyst with associated brainstem compression and progressive hydrocephalus. The operation resulted in clinical stabilization and freedom from tumor recurrence. Seven and a half years after undergoing GKS, the patient presented with symptoms of raised intracranial pressure. Magnetic resonance imaging demonstrated a new ring-enhancing lesion in the inferior temporal lobe adjacent to the area of radiosurgery. which on craniotomy was confirmed to be a glioblastoma multiforme (GBM). Despite additional conventional external-beam radiation to the temporal lobe, the GBM has progressed. Whereas this first reported case of a GBM within the scatter field of GKS does not conclusively prove a direct causal link, it does fulfill all of Cahan's criteria for radiation induced neoplasia. and demands increased vigilance for the potential long-term complications of stereotactic radiosurgery, and reporting of any similar cases.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据