4.7 Article

Complementary DNA cloning, functional expression and characterization of a novel cytochrome P450, CYP2D50, from equine liver

期刊

BIOCHEMICAL PHARMACOLOGY
卷 76, 期 7, 页码 904-911

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.bcp.2008.07.016

关键词

CYP450; horse; CYP2D; dextromethorphan; debrisoquine; phase I metabolism

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Members of the CYP2D family constitute only about 2-4% of total hepatic CYP450s, however, they are responsible for the metabolism of 20-25% of commonly prescribed therapeutic compounds. CYP2D enzymes have been identified in a number of different species. However, vast differences in the metabolic activity of these enzymes have been well documented. In the horse, the presence of a member of the CYP2D family has been suggested from studies with equine liver microsomes, however its presence has not been definitively proven. in this study a cDNA encoding a novel CYP2D enzyme (CYP2D50) was cloned from equine liver and expressed in a baculovirus expression system. The nucleotide sequence of CYP2D50 was highly homologous to that of human CYP2D6 and therefore the activity of the enzyme was characterized using dextromethorphan and debrisoquine, two isoform selective substrates for the human orthologue. CYP2D50 displayed optimal catalytic activity with dextromethorphan using molar ratios of CYP2D50 to NADPH CYP450 reductase of 1:15. Although CYP2D50 and CYP2D6 shared significant sequence homology, there were striking differences in the catalytic activity between the two enzymes. CYP2D50 dextromethorphan-O-demethylase activity was nearly 180-fold slower than the human counterpart, CYP2D6. Similarly, rates of formation of 4-hydroxydebrisoquine activity were 50-fold slower for CYP2D50 compared to CYP2D6. The results of this study demonstrate substantial inter-species variability in metabolism of substrates by CYP2D orthologues in the horse and human and support the need to fully characterize this enzyme system in equids. (c) 2008 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据