4.5 Article

Structural and functional characterization of the transcriptional regulator Rv3488 of Mycobacterium tuberculosis H37Rv

期刊

BIOCHEMICAL JOURNAL
卷 475, 期 -, 页码 3393-3416

出版社

PORTLAND PRESS LTD
DOI: 10.1042/BCJ20180356

关键词

-

资金

  1. DST [2016/0535]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Rv3488 of Mycobacterium tuberculosis H37Rv has been assigned to the phenolic acid decarboxylase repressor (PadR) family of transcriptional regulators that play key roles in multidrug resistance and virulence of prokaryotes. The binding of cadmium, zinc, and several other metals to Rv3488 was discovered and characterized by isothermal titration calorimetery to be an exothermic process. Crystal structures of apo-Rv3488 and Rv3488 in complex with cadmium or zinc ions were determined by X-ray crystallography. The structure of Rv3488 revealed a dimeric protein with N-terminal winged-helix-turn-helix DNA-binding domains composed of helices alpha 1, alpha 2, alpha 3, and strands beta 1 and beta 2, with the dimerization interface being formed of helices a4 and a1. The overall fold of Rv3488 was similar to PadR-s2 and metal sensor transcriptional regulators. In the crystal structure of Rv3488-Cd complex, two octahedrally coordinated Cd2+ ions were present, one for each subunit. The same sites were occupied by zinc ions in the structure of Rv3488-Zn, with two additional zinc ions complexed in one monomer. EMSA studies showed specific binding of Rv3488 with its own 30-bp promoter DNA. The functional role of Rv3488 was characterized by expressing the rv3488 gene under the control of hsp60 promoter in Mycobacterium smegmatis. Expression of Rv3488 increased the intracellular survival of recombinant M. smegmatis in murine macrophage cell line J774A. 1 and also augmented its tolerance to Cd2+ ions. Overall, the studies show that Rv3488 may have transcription regulation and metal-detoxifying functions and its expression in M. smegmatis increases intracellular survival, perhaps by counteracting toxic metal stress.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据