4.6 Article Proceedings Paper

Clinical variations and complications of coats disease in 150 cases: The 2000 Stanford Gifford Memorial Lecture

期刊

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY
卷 131, 期 5, 页码 561-571

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/S0002-9394(00)00883-7

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

PURPOSE: The purpose of this report is to review the clinical variations and natural course of Coats disease, using strict diagnostic guidelines. METHODS: In a retrospective, consecutive series, Coats disease was defined as idiopathic retinal telangiectasia with intraretinal or subretinal exudation without appreciable signs of retinal or vitreal traction. We reviewed our experience with the clinical features, complications, and diagnostic approaches to Coats disease. RESULTS: In 150 consecutive patients (158 eyes), Coats disease was diagnosed at a median age of 5 years was restricted to the macular area in two eyes (1%); involved mainly the temporal fundus in 66 eyes (42%), inferior fundus in 41 eyes (26%), and more than one sector in 34 eyes (22%). Retinal exudation was present in all 12 clock hours in 86 eyes (55%) and six or more clock hours in 115 eyes (73%). There was a total retinal detachment in 74 eyes (47%) and neovascular glaucoma in 12 (8%). Retinal macrocysts were present in 18 eyes (11%), a vasoproliferative tumor in nine eyes (6%) and retinal neovascularization in four eyes (3%). Fluorescein angiography in 49 of the 158 eyes (37%) disclosed early hyperfluorescence of the telangiectasias and macular edema in 18 of eyes (37%). Ultrasonography typically showed a retinal detachment but no solid mass. CONCLUSIONS: Coats disease is a distinct clinical entity characterized by idiopathic retinal telangiectasia and retinal exudation. It is usually unilateral, occurs mostly in young males, and can cause severe visual loss resulting from exudative retinal detachment. The clinician should follow strict criteria in making the diagnosis, to avoid confusing Coats disease with other forms of exudative retinopathy. (C) 2001 by Elsevier Science Inc. All rights reserved.).

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据