4.7 Article

Serotonin-induced platelet intracellular calcium mobilization in various psychiatric disorders: is it specific to bipolar disorder?

期刊

JOURNAL OF AFFECTIVE DISORDERS
卷 64, 期 2-3, 页码 291-296

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/S0165-0327(00)00221-4

关键词

bipolar disorder; serotonin; serotonin 5-HT2A receptor; calcium; platelet; signal transduction

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Serotonin (5-HT)-stimulated platelet intracellular calcium (Ca) mobilization has been reported to be enhanced in unmedicated depressive patients compared to those of normal healthy subjects, which suggests increased 5-HT2A receptor function in these patients. It has not been ascertained whether this enhanced response is specific to some type of affective disorders among various mental disorders. Methods: We examined 5-HT-induced platelet intracellular Ca response in 152 unmedicated outpatients with various psychiatric disorders including bipolar disorder (BD), major depressive disorder with melancholia (DM), major depressive disorder without melancholia (DN), schizophrenia (SCH), panic disorder (PD), obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD), social phobia (SP) and bulimia nervosa (BN), and 30 normal controls. Results: We observed no significant differences in basal intracellular Ca concentration among all patient subgroups and normal controls. While the 5-HT-induced Ca response was significantly and specifically higher in patients with ED than in normal controls, no significant differences were found in the Ca response to 5-HT between patients with DM, DN, SCH, PD, OCD, SP and BN, and normal controls. Limitations: The sample sizes of each group are still small. Therefore, they have to be enlarged in the continuation of the study so as to increase the power of the statistical tests. Conclusion: These results indicate the possibility that enhanced signal transduction, mediated by the 5-HT2A receptor, may be specific to bipolar disorder. (C) 2001 Elsevier Science B;V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据