4.5 Article Proceedings Paper

Prognostic factors and therapeutic strategy for anaplastic carcinoma of the thyroid

期刊

WORLD JOURNAL OF SURGERY
卷 25, 期 5, 页码 617-622

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s002680020166

关键词

-

类别

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Although anaplastic thyroid carcinoma (ATC) is one of the most aggressive malignancies, a few patients survive for a fairly long time after modern intensive treatment. We tried to identify prognostic factors of ATC to assist in deciding on the proper therapeutic strategy in individual patients, Of 47 patients with;ITC (1976-1999), 3 patients with incidental ATC (largely differentiated thyroid carcinoma with a small region of ATC) were excluded because they had a favorable outcome. The 1-year survival rate of the remaining 44 patients with clinically distinct ATC was 16%. The presence of acute symptoms, large tumor (> 5 cm), distant metastasis, and leukocytosis (white blood cell count greater than or equal to 10,000/mm(3)) proved to be significant risk factors. Multivariate analysis by the Cox proportional hazard model showed that these four factors were independent factors for predicting death from ATC, We devised a novel prognostic index (PI) based on the number of these four unfavorable characteristics the patient possessed. Patients with a PI of less than or equal to1 had a 62% survival rate at 6 months, whereas no patients with a PI of greater than or equal to3 survived longer than 6 months. All patients with a PI of 4 died from their disease within 3 months. Nine patients received multimodal treatment with a combination of surgery, external irradiation, and chemotherapy and had a long survival (mean 333 +/- 68 days; one patient is still alive and tumor-free), with a mean PI of 0.6, Our PI is useful as a means of selecting patients for aggressive therapy. When the PI is low, multimodal treatment should be attempted to obtain the best survival results; if it is high most patients are too seriously ill to tolerate intensive treatment and palliative therapy is recommended.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据