4.5 Article

Influence of association state and DNA binding on the O2-reactivity of [4Fe-4S] fumarate and nitrate reduction (FNR) regulator

期刊

BIOCHEMICAL JOURNAL
卷 463, 期 -, 页码 83-92

出版社

PORTLAND PRESS LTD
DOI: 10.1042/BJ20140169

关键词

cluster conversion; dimerization; DNA regulation; fumarate and nitrate reduction (FNR) regulator; iron-sulfur cluster; O-2-sensor

资金

  1. Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council [BB/G018960/1, BB/G019347/1, BB/J003247/1]
  2. Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council [BB/L007673/1, BB/G019347/1, BB/J003247/1, BB/G018960/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  3. BBSRC [BB/G018960/1, BB/G019347/1, BB/J003247/1, BB/L007673/1] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The fumarate and nitrate reduction (FNR) regulator is the master switch for the transition between anaerobic and aerobic respiration in Escherichia coli. Reaction of dimeric [4Fe-4S] FNR with O-2 results in conversion of the cluster into a [2Fe-2S] form, via a [3Fe-4S] intermediate, leading to the loss of DNA binding through dissociation of the dimer into monomers. In the present paper, we report studies of two previously identified variants of FNR, D154A and I151A, in which the form of the cluster is decoupled from the association state. In vivo studies of permanently dimeric D154A FNR show that DNA binding does not affect the rate of cluster incorporation into the apoprotein or the rate of O-2-mediated cluster loss. In vitro studies show that O-2-mediated cluster conversion for D154A and the permanent monomer I151A FNR is the same as in wild-type FNR, but with altered kinetics. Decoupling leads to an increase in the rate of the [3Fe-4S](1+) into [2Fe-2S](2+) conversion step, consistent with the suggestion that this step drives association state changes in the wild-type protein. We have also shown that DNA-bound FNR reacts more rapidly with O-2 than FNR free in solution, implying that transcriptionally active FNR is the preferred target for reaction with O-2.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据