4.5 Article

Copper chaperone Atox1 interacts with the metal-binding domain of Wilson's disease protein in cisplatin detoxification

期刊

BIOCHEMICAL JOURNAL
卷 454, 期 -, 页码 147-156

出版社

PORTLAND PRESS LTD
DOI: 10.1042/BJ20121656

关键词

ATPase; Cu(I) transport; Wilson disease protein (ATP7B); cisplatin; drug resistance; metal transport

资金

  1. Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR)
  2. Saskatchewan Health Research Foundation Regional Partnership Program
  3. NSERC
  4. CIHR-THRUST
  5. CIHR
  6. University of Saskatchewan
  7. U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Basic Energy Sciences and Office of Biological and Environmental Sciences
  8. National Institutes of Health, National Center for Research Resources
  9. Canada Research Chair award

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Human copper transporters ATP7B (Wilson's disease protein) and ATP7A (Menkes' disease protein) have been implicated in tumour resistance to cisplatin, a widely used anticancer drug. Cisplatin binds to the copper-binding sites in the N-terminal domain of ATP7B, and this binding may be an essential step of cisplatin detoxification involving copper ATPases. In the present study, we demonstrate that cisplatin and a related platinum drug carboplatin produce the same adduct following reaction with MBD2 [metal-binding domain (repeat) 2], where platinum is bound to the side chains of the cysteine residues in the CxxC copper-binding motif. This suggests the same mechanism for detoxification of both drugs by ATP7B. Platinum can also be transferred to MBD2 from copper chaperone Atox1, which was shown previously to bind cisplatin. Binding of the free cisplatin and reaction with the cisplatin-loaded Atox1 produce the same protein-bound platinum intermediate. Transfer of platinum along the copper-transport pathways in the cell may serve as a mechanism of drug delivery to its target in the cell nucleus, and explain tumour-cell resistance to cisplatin associated with the overexpression of copper transporters ATP7B and ATP7A.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据