4.5 Article

Differential contribution of isoaspartate post-translational modifications to the fibrillization and toxic properties of amyloid β and the Asn23 Iowa mutation

期刊

BIOCHEMICAL JOURNAL
卷 456, 期 -, 页码 347-360

出版社

PORTLAND PRESS LTD
DOI: 10.1042/BJ20130652

关键词

cerebral amyloid angiopathy; familial Alzheimer's disease; methazolamide; mitochondrial dysfunction; post-translational modification

资金

  1. National Institute of Health [NS051715, AG030539]
  2. Alzheimer's Association

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Mutations within the A beta (amyloid beta) peptide, especially those clustered at residues 21-23, are linked to early-onset AD (Alzheimer's disease) and primarily associated with cerebral amyloid angiopathy. The Iowa variant, a substitution of an aspartic acid residue for asparagine at position 23 (D23N), associates with widespread vascular amyloid and abundant diffuse pre-amyloid lesions significantly exceeding the incidence of mature plaques. Brain Iowa deposits consist primarily of a mixture of mutated and non-mutated A beta species exhibiting partial aspartate isomerization at positions 1,7 and 23. The present study analysed the contribution of the post-translational modification and the D23N mutation to the aggregation/fibrillization and cell toxicity properties of A beta providing insight into the elicited cell death mechanisms. The induction of apoptosis by the different A beta species correlated with their oligomerization/fibrillization propensity and beta-sheet content. Although cell toxicity was primarily driven by the D23N mutation, all A beta isoforms tested were capable, albeit at different time frames, of eliciting comparable apoptotic pathways with mitochondrial engagement and cytochrome c release to the cytoplasm in both neuronal and microvascular endothelial cells. Methazolamide, a cytochrome c release inhibitor, exerted a protective effect in both cell types, suggesting that pharmacological targeting of mitochondria may constitute a viable therapeutic avenue.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据