4.5 Article

Directed evolution of a temperature-, peroxide- and alkaline pH-tolerant versatile peroxidase

期刊

BIOCHEMICAL JOURNAL
卷 441, 期 -, 页码 487-498

出版社

PORTLAND PRESS LTD
DOI: 10.1042/BJ20111199

关键词

alpha-factor prepro-leader; directed evolution; enzyme promiscuity; Saccharomyces cerevisiae; versatile peroxidase

资金

  1. European Union [NMP2-CT-2006-026456-Biorenew, FP7-KBBE-2010-4-26537-Peroxicats, CM0701]
  2. National projects [BIO2010-19697, BIO2008-01533]
  3. NeuronBiopharma [020401070029, 020401070004]
  4. Biorenew grant
  5. Peroxicats contract
  6. Ministerio de Cienca e Innovacion (MICINN)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The VPs (versatile peroxidases) secreted by white-rot fungi are involved in the natural decay of lignin. In the present study, a fusion gene containing the VP from Pleurotus eryngii was subjected to six rounds of directed evolution, achieving a level of secretion in Saccharomyces cerevisiae (21 mg/l) as yet unseen for any ligninolytic peroxidase. The evolved variant for expression harboured four mutations and increased its total VP activity 129-fold. The signal leader processing by the STEI3 protease at the Golgi compartment changed as a consequence of overexpression, retaining the additional N-terminal sequence Glu-Ala-Glu-Ala that enhanced secretion. The engineered N-terminally truncated variant displayed similar biochemical properties to those of the non-truncated counterpart in terms of kinetics, stability and spectroscopic features. Additional cycles of evolution raised the T-50 8 degrees C and significantly increased the enzyme's stability at alkaline pHs. In addition, the K-m for H2O2 was enhanced up to 15-fold while the catalytic efficiency was maintained, and there was an improvement in peroxide stability (with half-lives for H2O2 of 43 min at a H2O2/enzyme molar ratio of 4000:1). Overall, the directed evolution approach described provides a set of strategies for selecting VPs with improvements in secretion, activity and stability.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据