4.5 Article

GABAA but not GABAB receptor stimulation induces antianxiety profile in rats

期刊

PHARMACOLOGY BIOCHEMISTRY AND BEHAVIOR
卷 69, 期 1-2, 页码 9-15

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/S0091-3057(01)00518-4

关键词

GABA agonists and antagonists; anxiety; rats

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The effect of GABA receptor agonists and antagonists on anxiety behavior in rats in the elevated-plus-maze has been investigated. The increase in two parameters of %open arm entries (%OAE) and %time spent in the open arms (%OAT) and decrease in the %time spent in closed arm (%CAT) was considered as antianxiety effects. Intracerebroventricular (icv) injection of different doses of the GABA(A) receptor agonist muscimol (0.25, 0.5, and 1 mug/rat) increased %OAE and %OAT and decreased %CAT in rats dose-dependently. The higher response was obtained with 1 mug/rat of the drug. Neither icy (0.05, 0.1, and 0.2 mug/rat) nor intraperitoneal (ip) (1, 2, and 4 mg/kg) injection of the GABA(B) receptor agonist baclofen altered %OAE, %OAT, and %CAT. However, the GABA(B) receptor antagonist CGP35348 (5, 10, and 30 mug/rat icy) increased %OAE and %OAT and decreased %CAT in the animals. The response induced by injection of muscimol (0.5 mug/rat icy) or administration of CGP35348 (10 mug/rat icy) was reduced by icy (1, 2, and 4 mug/rat) or ip (0.25, 0.5, and 0.75 mg/kg) injection of the GABA(A) receptor antagonist bicuculline, except the effect of CGP35348 on %CAT which was not significantly altered by ip administration of bicuculline. Ip but not icy administration of bicuculline by itself reduced both %OAE and %OAT but did not alter %CAT. None of the drugs altered the locomotor activity of the animals. The current findings support our hypothesis that the anxiolytic effects of GABA(B) antagonist are mediated by autoreceptor blockade-induced release of endogenous GABA, which in turn activates postsynaptic GABA(A) receptors. (C) 2001 Elsevier Science Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据