4.5 Article

2-Carboxy-D-arabinitol 1-phosphate (CA1P) phosphatase: evidence for a wider role in plant Rubisco regulation

期刊

BIOCHEMICAL JOURNAL
卷 442, 期 -, 页码 733-742

出版社

PORTLAND PRESS LTD
DOI: 10.1042/BJ20111443

关键词

2-carboxyarabinitol 1-phosphate (CA1P); D-glycero-2,3-pentodiulose-1,5-bisphosphate (PDBP) phosphatase; ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase/oxygenase (Rubisco)

资金

  1. Biotechnological and Biological Sciences Research Council of the U.K
  2. BBSRC [BB/D525121/1, BBS/E/C/00004952, BBS/E/C/00004976, BBS/E/C/00005202, BBS/E/C/00004978] Funding Source: UKRI
  3. Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council [BBS/E/C/00004976, BB/D525121/1, BBS/E/C/00004952, BBS/E/C/00005202, BBS/E/C/00004978, BBS/E/C/00004559] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The genes for CA 1 Pase (2-carboxy-D-arabinito1-1-bisphosphate phosphatase) from French bean, wheat. Arabidopsis and tobacco were identified and cloned. The deduced protein sequence included an N-terminal motif identical with the PGM (phosphoglycerate mutase) active site sequence [LIVM[x-R-H-G-[EQ]-x-x-[WN]. The corresponding gene from wheat coded for an enzyme with the properties published for CA1Pase. The expressed protein lacked PGM activity but rapidly dephosphorylated 2,3-DPG (2,3-diphosphoglycerate) to 2-phosphoglycerate. DTT (dithiothreitol) activation and GSSG inactivation of this enzyme was pH-sensitive, the greatest difference being apparent at pH 8. The presence of the expressed protein during in vitro measurement of Rubisco (ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase/oxygenase) activity prevented a progressive decline in Rubisco turnover. This was due to the removal of an inhibitory bisphosphate that was present in the RuBP (ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate) preparation, and was found to be PDBP (D-glycero-2,3-pentodiulose-1,5-bisphosphate). The substrate specificity of the expressed protein indicates a role for CA I Pase in the removal of 'misfire' products of Rubisco.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据