4.5 Article

Cold sensitivity in rice (Oryza sativa L.) is strongly correlated with a naturally occurring 199V mutation in the multifunctional glutathione transferase isoenzyme GSTZ2

期刊

BIOCHEMICAL JOURNAL
卷 435, 期 -, 页码 373-380

出版社

PORTLAND PRESS LTD
DOI: 10.1042/BJ20101610

关键词

chilling tolerance; glutathione transferase Zeta; isoform; Oryza sativa; single nucleotide polymorphism

资金

  1. USDA-ARS (United States Department of Agriculture-Agricultural Research Service) CRIS (Current Research Information System) [5306-21000-017-00D]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

GSTZs [Zeta class GSTs (glutathione transferases)] are multifunctional enzymes that belong to a highly conserved subfamily of soluble GSTs found in species ranging from fungi and plants to animals. GSTZs are known to function as MAAIs [MAA (maleylacetoacetate) isomerases], which play a role in tyrosine catabolism by catalysing the isomerization of MAA to FAA (fumarylacetoacetate). As tyrosine metabolism in plants differs from animals, the significance of GSTZ/MAAI is unclear. In rice (Oryza saliva L.), a major QTL (quantitative trait locus) for seedling cold tolerance has been fine mapped to a region containing the genes OsGSTZ1 and OsGSTZ2. Sequencing of tolerant (ssp. japonica cv. M-202) and sensitive (ssp. indica cv. IR50) cultivars revealed two SNPs (single nucleotide polymorphisms) in OsGSTZ2 that result in amino acid differences (199V and N1841). Recombinant OsGSTZ2 containing the Val(99) residue found in IR50 had significantly reduced activity on MAA and DCA (dichloroacetic acid), but the Ile(184) residue had no effect. The distribution of the SNP (c.295A>G) among various rice accessions indicates a significant association with chilling sensitivity in rice seedlings. The results of the present study show that naturally occurring OsGSTZ2 isoforms differ in their enzymatic properties, which may contribute to the differential response to chilling stress generally exhibited by the two major rice subspecies.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据