4.5 Article Proceedings Paper

Molecular detection of respiratory syncytial virus in postmortem lung tissue samples from Mexican children deceased with pneumonia

期刊

PEDIATRIC INFECTIOUS DISEASE JOURNAL
卷 20, 期 5, 页码 495-501

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/00006454-200105000-00005

关键词

respiratory syncytial virus; reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction; lung tissue; pneumonia

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background. Respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) is the major viral cause of severe respiratory infections in children younger than 2 years of age. Nevertheless there are not enough epidemiologic data about the role of RSV as a cause of infantile mortality from pneumonia, mainly in young children from developing countries Aim To determine the frequency of RSV infection in lung tissue samples from Mexican children deceased with pneumonia, by reverse transcription (RT) and PCR. Methods. Postmortem lung tissue samples from 98 children younger than 2 years of age who died of pneumonia during the period of 1989 to 1997 were studied. Paraffin was removed with xylene from 10-mum lung sections, the total RNA was extracted and complementary DNA was obtained by RT reaction. A nested PCR with the use of oligonucleotides specific for the F glycoprotein gene was developed. Samples negatives for RSV were tested for the absence of polymerase inhibitors and for complementary DNA integrity. Results. Twenty-nine of the 98 (30%) children deceased with pneumonia were positive for RSV by RT-PCR; 8 were detected from 13 (62%) children with histopathologic diagnosis of viral pneumonia and 21 from 85 (25%) children with histopathologic diagnosis of bacterial pneumonia (P = 0.018). There was no significant difference in RSV infection according to age groups or seasonal pattern. Conclusions. RSV infection is frequent in Mexican children younger than 2 years of age who died of pneumonia. Although RSV was more common in viral pneumonia, mixed infections with RSV and bacterial pneumonia were also common.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据