4.5 Review

Towards the molecular mechanism of respiratory complex I

期刊

BIOCHEMICAL JOURNAL
卷 425, 期 -, 页码 327-339

出版社

PORTLAND PRESS LTD
DOI: 10.1042/BJ20091382

关键词

electron transport chain; enzyme mechanism; mitochondrion; NADH:quinone oxidoreductase; proton-coupled electron transfer; proton translocation

资金

  1. Medical Research Council
  2. MRC [MC_U105663141] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Complex I (NADH:quinone oxidoreductase) is crucial to respiration in many aerobic organisms. In mitochondria, it oxidizes NADH (to regenerate NAD+ for the tricarboxylic acid cycle and fatty-acid oxidation), reduces ubiquinone (the electrons are ultimately used to reduce oxygen to water) and transports protons across the mitochondrial inner membrane (to produce and sustain the protonmotive force that supports ATP synthesis and transport processes). Complex I is also a major contributor to reactive oxygen species production in the cell. Understanding the mechanisms of energy transduction and reactive oxygen species production by complex I is not only a significant intellectual challenge, but also a prerequisite for understanding the roles of complex I in disease, and for the development of effective therapies. One approach to defining a complicated reaction mechanism is to break it down into manageable parts that can be tackled individually, before being recombined and integrated to produce the complete picture. Thus energy transduction by complex I comprises NADH oxidation by a Favin mononucleotide, intramolecular electron transfer from the flavin to bound quinone along a chain of iron-sulfur clusters, quinone reduction and proton translocation. More simply, molecular oxygen is reduced by the flavin, to form the reactive oxygen species superoxide and hydrogen peroxide. The present review summarizes and evaluates experimental data that pertain to the reaction mechanisms of complex I, and describes and discusses contemporary mechanistic hypotheses, proposals and models.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据