4.6 Article

Differential biosynthesis of polysialic or disialic acid structure by ST8Sia II and ST8Sia IV

期刊

JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL CHEMISTRY
卷 276, 期 19, 页码 15696-15703

出版社

AMER SOC BIOCHEMISTRY MOLECULAR BIOLOGY INC
DOI: 10.1074/jbc.M010371200

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

ST8Sia II (STX) and ST8Sia IV (PST) are polysialic acid (polySia) syntheses that catalyze polySia formation of neural cell adhesion molecule (NCAM) in vivo and in vitro. It still remains unclear how these structurally similar enzymes act differently in vivo. In the present study, we performed the enzymatic characterization of ST8Sia II and IV; both ST8Sia II and IV have pH optima of 5.8-6.1 and have no requirement of metal ions. Because the pH dependence of ST8Sia II and IV enzyme activities and the pK profile of His residues are similar, we hypothesized that a histidine residue would be involved in their catalytic activity. There is a conserved His residue (cf. His(348) in ST8Sia II and His(331) in ST8Sia IV, respectively) within the sialyl motif VS in all sialyltransferase genes cloned to date. Mutant ST8Sia II and IV enzymes in which this His residue was changed to Lys showed no detectable enzyme activity, even though they were folded correctly and could bind to CDP-hexanolamine, suggesting the importance of the His residue for their catalytic activity. Next, the degrees of polymerization of polySia in NCAM catalyzed by ST8Sia II and IV were compared. ST8Sia IV catalyzed larger polySia formation of NCAM than ST8Sia II. We also analyzed the (auto)polysialylated enzymes themselves. Interestingly, when ST8Sia II or IV itself was sialylated under conditions for polysialylation, the disialylated compound was the major product, even though polysialylated compounds were also observed. These results suggested that both ST8Sia II and IV catalyze polySia synthesis toward preferred acceptor substrates such as NCAM, whereas they mainly catalyze disialylation, similarly to ST8Sia III, toward unfavorable substrates such as enzyme themselves.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据