4.5 Article

Dynamic interaction of hTRPC6 with the Orai1-STIM1 complex or hTRPC3 mediates its role in capacitative or non-capacitative Ca2+ entry pathways

期刊

BIOCHEMICAL JOURNAL
卷 420, 期 -, 页码 267-276

出版社

PORTLAND PRESS LTD
DOI: 10.1042/BJ20082179

关键词

calcium entry; human canonical transient receptor potential 3 (hTRPC3); human canonical transient receptor potential 6 (hTRPC6); Orail; platelet; stromal interaction molecule 1 (STIM 1); thrombin

资金

  1. Ministry of Education and Science [BFU2007-60104]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

TRPC (canonical transient receptor potential) channel subunits have been shown to assemble into homo- or hetero-meric channel complexes, including different Ca2+-handling proteins, required for the activation of CCE (capacitative Ca2+ entry) or NCCE (non-CCE) pathways. In the present study we found evidence for the dynamic interaction between endogenously expressed hTRPC6 (human TRPC6) with either both Orai 1 and STIMI (stromal interaction molecule I) or hTRPC3 to participate in CCE or NCCE. Electrotransjection of cells with all anti-hTRPC6 antibody, directed towards the C-terminal region, reduces CCE induced by TPEN [N,N,',N'-tetrakis-(2-pyridylmethyl)-ethylenediamine], which reduces the intraluminal free Ca2+ concentration. Cell stimulation with thrombin or extensive Ca2+-store depletion by TG (thapsigargin) + ionomycin enhanced the interaction between hTRPC6 and the CCE proteins Oral I and STIM1 I. In contrast, stimulation with the diacylglycerol analogue OAG (1-oleoyl-2-acetyl-sn-glycerol) displaces hTRPC6 from Orai1 and STIM1 and enhances the association between hTRPC6 and hTRPC3. The interaction between hTRPC6 and hTRPC3 was abolished by dinlethyl-BAPI'A [1.2-bis(o-aminophenoxy)ethane-N,N,N'.N'-tetra-acetic acid) loading, which indicates that this phenomenon is Ca2+-dependent. These findings support the hypothesis that hTRPC6 participates both in CC E and NCCE through its interaction with tire Orai1-STIM1 complex or hTRPC3 respectively.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据