4.8 Article

Fluorescent nanosensors for intracellular chemical analysis: Decyl methacrylate liquid polymer matrix and ion exchange-based potassium PEBBLE sensors with real-time application to viable rat C6 glioma cells

期刊

ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY
卷 73, 期 10, 页码 2221-2228

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/ac0012041

关键词

-

资金

  1. NCI NIH HHS [N01-CO-07013] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIEHS NIH HHS [R01-ES08846] Funding Source: Medline
  3. NIGMS NIH HHS [R01-GM50300-04A1] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Fluorescent spherical nanosensors, or PEBBLEs (probes encapsulated by biologically localized embedding), in the 500 nm-1 mum size range have been developed using decyl methacrylate as a matrix. A general scheme for the polymerization and introduction of sensing components creates a matrix that allows for the utilization of the highly selective ionophores used in poly(vinyl chloride) and decyl methacrylate ion-selective electrodes. We have applied these optically silent ionophores to fluorescence-based sensing by using ion-exchange and highly selective pH chromoionophores. This allows the tailoring of selective submicrometer sensors for use in intracellular measurements of important analytes for which selective enough fluorescent probes do not exist. The protocol for sensor development has been worked out for potassium sensing. It is based on the BME-44 ionophore (2-dodecyl-2-methyl-1,3-propanediylbis[N-[5'nitro(benzo-15-crown-5)4'-yl]carbamate]). The general scheme should work for any available ionophore used in PVC or decyl methacrylate ion-selective electrodes, with minor adjustments to account for differences in ionophore charge and analyte binding constant. The reversible and highly selective sensors developed have a subsecond response time and an adjustable dynamic range. Applications to live C6 glioma cells demonstrate their utility; the intracellular potassium activity is followed in real time upon extracellular administration of kainic acid.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据