4.7 Article

Wood density of radiata pine: effect of nitrogen supply

期刊

FOREST ECOLOGY AND MANAGEMENT
卷 145, 期 3, 页码 173-180

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/S0378-1127(00)00405-9

关键词

wood density prediction; foliar nitrogen; wood quality; carbon sequestration

类别

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In a comparison of 27-year-old Pinus radiata D. Don on a nitrogen deficient coastal dune and growing with or without lupin plus fertiliser, mean wood density, earlywood density, and latewood density in individual annual growth rings were significantly lower in treated as compared to control stands. Latewood percentage showed a similar pattern of variation in relation to treatment and tree age when the ring was laid down. Wood density and latewood percentage increased radially from pith to bark, both increasing more rapidly in unfertilised compared to fertilised trees. Mean density, earlywood density, and latewood percentage were significantly related to tree nitrogen status, as reflected by foliar analysis undertaken in the year rings were laid down, and to ring age. Other foliar nutrients tested (P, K, Ca, Mg, B, Mn, Zn, Cu) did not appear to influence wood density when analysed in the presence of N. Wood density was high at this trial site by New Zealand standards, even in fertilised stands, which can be explained at least partly by the low foliar N levels at Woodhill Forest. These exceeded 1.2% only in stands younger than 5 years old. Thereafter, foliar N decreased to approximate to1.2% in fertilised stands receiving 100 kg Nka of fertiliser annually for 10 years, and 0.8% in unfertilised controls. Foliar N levels on recent sands typically fall in the range of 0.9-1.2% at Woodhill Forest, compared to 1.2 -->1.5% in most other soil types in NZ. Effective rainfall at Woodhill also tends to be lower than other forest growing areas in New Zealand. At Woodhill, low rainfall during autumn/winter/spring was associated with high latewood percentage and, hence, high ring mean density, while low summer rainfall had the opposite effects. (C) 2001 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据