4.5 Review

At the crossroads of homoeostasis and disease: roles of the PACS proteins in membrane traffic and apoptosis

期刊

BIOCHEMICAL JOURNAL
卷 421, 期 -, 页码 1-15

出版社

PORTLAND PRESS LTD
DOI: 10.1042/BJ20081016

关键词

Akt; cancer; furin; herpesvirus; HIV-1; Nef; phosphofurin acidic cluster sorting (PACS)-1/2; polycystin-2; secretory pathway; tumour-necrosis-factor-related apoptosis-inducing ligand (TRAIL); 14-3-3 protein

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health [DK37274, A149793, P50CA971861]
  2. OCTRI (Oregon Clinical and Translational Research Institute) [RR0241]
  3. NRSA (National Research Service Award) [DK076343]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The endomembrane system in mammalian cells has evolved over the past two billion years from a simple endocytic pathway in a single-celled primordial ancestor to complex networks supporting multicellular structures that form metazoan tissue and organ systems. The increased organellar complexity of metazoan cells requires additional trafficking machinery absent in yeast or other unicellular organisms to maintain organ homoeostasis and to process the signals that control proliferation, differentiation or the execution of cell death programmes. The PACS (phosphofurin acidic cluster sorting) proteins are one such family of multifunctional membrane traffic regulators that mediate organ homoeostasis and have important roles in diverse pathologies and disease states. This review summarizes our current knowledge of the PACS proteins, including their structure and regulation in cargo binding, their genetics, their roles in secretory and endocytic pathway traffic, interorganellar communication and how cell-death signals reprogramme the PACS proteins to regulate apoptosis. We also summarize our current understanding of how PACS genes are dysregulated in cancer and how viral pathogens ranging from HIV-1 to herpesviruses have evolved to usurp the PACS sorting machinery to promote virus assembly, viral spread and immunoevasion.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据