4.5 Article

A study of the ultrastructure of Fragile-X-related proteins

期刊

BIOCHEMICAL JOURNAL
卷 419, 期 -, 页码 347-357

出版社

PORTLAND PRESS LTD
DOI: 10.1042/BJ20082197

关键词

biophysics; fragile X mental retardation; fragile-X-related protein; small-angle X-ray scattering; structure

资金

  1. Medical Research Council at the National Institute for Medical Research
  2. Medical Research Council [MC_U117584256, MC_U117533887, MC_U117565647] Funding Source: researchfish
  3. MRC [MC_U117533887, MC_U117565647, MC_U117584256] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Fragile-X-related proteins form a family implicated in RNA metabolism. Their sequence is composed of conserved N-terminal and central regions which contain Tudor and KH domains and of a divergent C-terminus with motifs rich in arginine and glycine residues. The most widely studied member of the family is probably FMRP (fragile X mental retardation protein), since absence or mutation of this protein in humans causes fragile X syndrome, the most common cause of inherited mental retardation. Understanding the structural properties of FMRP is essential for correlating it with its functions. The structures of isolated domains of FMRP have been reported, but nothing is yet known with regard to the spatial arrangement of the different modules, partly because of difficulties in producing both the full-length protein and its multidomain fragments in quantities, purities and monodispersity amenable for structural studies. In the present study, we describe how we have produced overlapping recombinant fragments of human FMRP and its paralogues which encompass the evolutionary conserved region. We have studied their behaviour in solution by complementary biochemical and biophysical techniques, identified the regions which promote self-association and determined their over-all three-dimensional shape. The present study paves the way to further Studies and rationalizes the existing knowledge on the self-association properties of these proteins.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据