4.5 Article

4-1BBL enhances anti-tumor responses in the presence or absence of CD28 but CD28 is required for protective immunity against parental tumors

期刊

CELLULAR IMMUNOLOGY
卷 210, 期 1, 页码 56-65

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1006/cimm.2001.1804

关键词

CD28; 4-1BB; tumor immunity; cytotoxic T cell responses

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A20 is an aggressive BALB/c B cell lymphoma that, despite its expression of B7-2, rapidly forms tumors in syngeneic mice. We have generated A20 transfectants expressing elevated levels of B7-2 (A20/B7-2(high)) or 4-1BBL (A20/4-1BBL(low,mod,high)) and found that mice which were able to reject the A20/B7-2 or A20/4-IBBL transfectants were also resistant to subsequent systemic challenge with the parental cell line. To assess whether the effectiveness of 4-1BBL in enhancing antitumor immunogenicity was dependent on additional signals from B7-CD28 interaction, we injected the A20 variants into BALB/c CD28(-/-) mice. We found that CD28(-/-) mice were able to reject the A20/4-1BBL variants while A20/B7-2 cells formed tumors. However, when the A,20/4-1BBL resistant CD28(-/-) mice were systemically challenged with the A20 parental line, tumors formed rapidly. Upon restimulation in vitro, splenocytes from A20/4-IBBL immunized CD28(+/+) mice were able to kill parental tumors whereas splenocytes from CD28(-/-) mice showed a reduction in CTL activity against A20 or A20/4-1BBL targets. Examination of cytokine production by the immunized animals indicated that the CD28(-/-) splenocytes secreted substantially less IL-2 as well as reduced levels of IFN-gamma compared with their CD28(+/+) counterparts. Thus, 4-1BBL expressing tumors are capable of priming CTL responses against 4-1BBL transfected as well as parental tumors in the absence of CD28. However, in the absence of CD28 signaling, the production of cytokines and particularly IL-2 was lower, resulting in a weaker CTL recall response and reduced ability to survive challenge with parental tumor. (C) 2001 Academic Press.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据