4.6 Article

Matrix-dependent proteolysis of surface transglutaminase by membrane-type metalloproteinase regulates cancer cell adhesion and locomotion

期刊

JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL CHEMISTRY
卷 276, 期 21, 页码 18415-18422

出版社

AMER SOC BIOCHEMISTRY MOLECULAR BIOLOGY INC
DOI: 10.1074/jbc.M010135200

关键词

-

资金

  1. NCI NIH HHS [CA77470, CA83017, CA77697] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Cell invasion requires cooperation between adhesion receptors and matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs). Membrane type (MT)-MMPs have been thought to be primarily involved in the breakdown of the extracellular matrix. Our report presents evidence that MT-MMPs in addition to the breakdown of the extracellular matrix may be engaged in proteolysis of adhesion receptors on tumor cell surfaces. Overexpression of MT1-MMP by glioma and fibrosarcoma cells led to proteolytic degradation of cell surface tissue transglutaminase (tTG) at the leading edge of motile cancer cells. In agreement, structurally related MT1-MMP, MT2-MMP, and MT3-MMP but not evolutionary distant MT4-MMP efficiently degraded purified tTG in vitro, Because cell surface tTG; represents a ubiquitously expressed, potent integrin-binding adhesion coreceptor involved in the binding of cells to fibronectin (Fn), the proteolytic degradation of tTG by MT1-MMP specifically suppressed cell adhesion and migration on Fn, Reciprocally, Fn in vitro and in cultured cells protected its surface receptor, tTG, from proteolysis by MT1-MMP, thereby supporting cell adhesion and locomotion. In contrast, the proteolytic degradation of tTG stimulated migration of cells on collagen matrices. Together, our observations suggest both an important coreceptor role for cell surface tTG and a novel regulatory function of membrane-anchored MMPs in cancer cell adhesion and locomotion. Proteolysis of adhesion proteins colocalized with MT-MMPs at discrete regions on the surface of migrating tumor cells might be controlled by composition of the surrounding ECM.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据