4.6 Article

Combined treatment with vitamin E and vitamin C decreases oxidative stress and improves fetal outcome in experimental diabetic pregnancy

期刊

PEDIATRIC RESEARCH
卷 49, 期 6, 页码 755-762

出版社

INT PEDIATRIC RESEARCH FOUNDATION, INC
DOI: 10.1203/00006450-200106000-00007

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The aim was to investigate whether dietary supplementation of a combination of the two antioxidants, vitamin E and vitamin C, would protect the fetus in diabetic rat pregnancy at a lower dose than previously used. Normal and streptozotocin-induced diabetic rats were mated and given standard food or food supplemented with either 0.5% vitamin E + 1% vitamin C or 2% vitamin E + 4% vitamin C, At gestational d 20, gross morphology and weights of fetuses were evaluated. Vitamins E and C and thiobarbituric acid reactive substances were measured in maternal and fetal compartments. In addition, protein carbonylation was estimated in fetal liver. Maternal diabetes increased the rate of malformation and resorption in the offspring. High-dose antioxidant supplementation decreased fetal dysmorphogenesis to near normal levels. The low-dose group showed malformations and resorptions at an intermediate rate between the untreated and the high-dose groups. Thiobarbituric acid reactive substances were increased in fetal livers of diabetic rats and reduced to normal levels already by low-dose antioxidative treatment. Protein carbonylation rate was also increased in fetal liver of diabetic rats; it was normalized by high-dose treatment but only partially reduced by low-dose antioxidants. We conclude that combined antioxidative treatment with vitamins E and C decreases fetal malformation rate and diminishes oxygen radical-related tissue damage. However, no synergistic effect between the two antioxidants was noted, a result that may influence future attempts to design antiteratogenic treatments in diabetic pregnancy. Oxidatively modified proteins may be teratogenically important mediators in diabetic embryopathy.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据