4.6 Article

The role of volumetric power input in the growth, morphology, and production of a recombinant glycoprotein by Streptomyces lividans in shake flasks

期刊

BIOCHEMICAL ENGINEERING JOURNAL
卷 90, 期 -, 页码 224-233

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.bej.2014.06.010

关键词

Shaken bioreactors; Morphology; Orbital shaking; Power dissipation; Suspension rheology; Recombinant glycoproteins

资金

  1. Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnologia [CONACyT 178528, CONACYT-INNOVAPYME 214404]
  2. Programa de Apoyo a Proyectos de Investigacion e Innovacion Tecnologica, Universidad Nacional Autonoma de Mexico [PAPIIT-UNAM IN-210013, IN-209113]
  3. Colciencias-Colombia
  4. EAFIT University (Colombia)
  5. CONACYT-Mexico

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The impact of flask geometry on Streptomyces lividans growth and morphology, production and O-mannosylation of a recombinant O-glycoprotein (APA from Mycobacterium tuberculosis) was described and associated to the evolution of the volumetric power input (P/V) in three shake flask geometries. During the exponential growth, the highest P/V was found in baffled flasks (BF) with 0.51 kW/m(3), followed by coiled flasks (CF) with 0.44 kW/m(3) and normal Erlenmeyer flasks (NF) with 0.20 kW/m(3) (flasks volume of 250 mL, filling with 50 mL and agitated at 150 rpm). During the stationary phase, P/V decreased 20% in BF and CF, but increased two times in NF, surely due to changes in mycelial morphology and its effects on rheology. Also, NF cultures were carried out at a filling volume and agitation of 15 mL, 150 rpm (15 mL-NF), and 25 mL, 168 rpm (25 mL-NF), in order to raise P/V closely to the values obtained in CF. However, different growth, morphology and recombinant protein productivity were obtained. These data indicate that P/V is not a definitive parameter that can determine bacteria growth and morphology, not even glycoprotein production. But it can be proposed that the oxygen transfer in the center of the pellets and hydromechanical stress might be the more relevant parameters than P/V. (C) 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据