4.6 Article

Fed-batch operational strategies for recombinant Fab production with Pichia pastoris using the constitutive GAP promoter

期刊

BIOCHEMICAL ENGINEERING JOURNAL
卷 79, 期 -, 页码 172-181

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.bej.2013.07.013

关键词

Pichia pastoris; Recombinant protein production; Antibody fragment; P-GAP; Fed-batch; Specific growth rate; Substrates

资金

  1. Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation [CTQ2010-15131]
  2. Reference Network in Biotechnology (XRB) (Generalitat de Catalunya) [2009-SGR-281]
  3. FPU of the Spanish Ministry of Education, Culture and Sport

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Carbon source and growth rate are two major parameters affecting recombinant protein production in Pichia pastoris. The effect of the most commonly used carbon sources (glycerol or glucose) and the specific growth rate (mu) has been studied on the production of a human antigen-binding fragment (Fab) in this cell factory under the constitutive GAP promoter in fed-batch cultures. Glycerol for batch phase and glucose for fed-batch phase was the most successful carbon source combination. During batch phase, by-products were detected when glucose was used, despite maintaining DO at values higher than 35%. Also, the presence of cell aggregates was detected affecting the reproducibility and operability of the bioprocess. Conversely, glucose was the best substrate for fed-batch phase. When working at C-limiting conditions, neither by-products nor aggregates were detected and Fab production levels were comparable to those obtained with glycerol. In addition, the lower heat yield (Y-Q/X) and oxygen to biomass yield (Y-O2/X) for glucose-supported cultures made this substrate the best alternative from an industrial operational point of view. In addition, the effect of specific growth rate on fed-batch Fab production was studied. Medium and high mu (0.10 and 0.15 h(-1)) set-points showed similar Fab production yield. However, in terms of total and volumetric productivity, higher mu was the best process condition. (C) 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据