4.6 Article

Optimization of carbon and nitrogen sources for biomass and lipid production by Chlorella saccharophila under heterotrophic conditions and development of Nile red fluorescence based method for quantification of its neutral lipid content

期刊

BIOCHEMICAL ENGINEERING JOURNAL
卷 61, 期 -, 页码 11-19

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.bej.2011.12.001

关键词

Microalgae; Heterotrophic culture; Batch processing; Optimization; Bioreactors; Lipid

资金

  1. Scientific and Technological Research Council of Turkey (TUBITAK) [109M227]
  2. EBILTEM (Ege University Science and Technology Center) [2010/BIL/013]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, initially, the carbon and nitrogen source preferences of Chlorella saccharophila were examined in terms of biomass productivities under heterotrophic growth conditions. It was shown that C. saccharophila could actively utilize glucose and glycerol as carbon sources and bacteriological peptone as a nitrogen source. Secondly, the concentrations of nitrogen and carbon sources that were found to significantly influence the biomass productivity of heterotrophic C. saccharophila were further optimized by using Box-Behnken experimental design. Lastly, in a scale-up attempt, the medium consisting of 20 g/L glucose and 1 g/L bacteriological peptone was used in a 3 L stirred tank bioreactor in which the final biomass concentration obtained was 7.7 fold higher than that of obtained under autotrophic conditions. Also, lipid content in heterotrophic cells of C. saccharophila was increased about 3 times compared to that of autotrophic cells. The principal fatty acids in heterotrophic C saccharophila were oleic acid (C18:1) and linoleic acid (C18:2) constituting 34.4% and 30.1% of the total fatty acid contents, respectively. Moreover, a simple and rapid method determining the neutral lipid accumulation in C. saccharophila with spectrofloorimetry was developed and used easily for monitoring lipid accumulation in a stirred tank bioreactor. (C) 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据