4.5 Article Proceedings Paper

Efficacy and safety of mirtazapine in major depressive disorder patients after SSRI treatment failure: An open-label trial

期刊

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PSYCHIATRY
卷 62, 期 6, 页码 413-420

出版社

PHYSICIANS POSTGRADUATE PRESS
DOI: 10.4088/JCP.v62n0603

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of mirtazapine in depressed outpatients who have shown nonresponse or intolerance to selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) therapy. Method: In this open-label, 8-week; study, the efficacy and safety of mirtazapine among 103 outpatients with DSM-IV major depressive disorder who had failed previous therapy with an SSRI (fluoxetine, paroxetine, or sertraline) were evaluated. The primary efficacy measure was the 17-item Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HAM-D-17), and safety assessments included reported adverse events, routine laboratory assessments, physical examinations, and assessments of vital signs. A 4-day washout period followed by mirtazapine treatment was compared with an immediate switch from the SSRI to mirtazapine. Results: Based un mean HAM-D-17 scores at endpoint and response rates of 48% based on the criterion of greater than or equal to 50% reduction in HAM-D-17 score, mirtazapine was found to be an effective treatment fur a substantial proportion of patients for whom an SSRI was ineffective and/or poorly tolerated. Mirtazapine was well tolerated, with sedation and appetite increase/weight gain the most commonly reported adverse events. In addition, no difference in efficacy, safety, or tolerability was observed fur patients undergoing an immediate switch from an SSRI (after having been tapered to the minimal effective dose) to mirtazapine, compared with those undergoing the imposition of a 4-day drug-free washout. Conclusion: These results suggest that an immediate switch to mirtazapine may be a valid therapeutic option among patients who cannot tolerate or do not respond to SSRIs.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据