4.3 Article

Aqueous flare induced by heparin-surface-modified poly(methyl methacrylate) and acrylic lenses implanted through the same-size incision in patients with diabetes

期刊

JOURNAL OF CATARACT AND REFRACTIVE SURGERY
卷 27, 期 6, 页码 855-860

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/S0886-3350(00)00814-2

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purpose: To compare the degree of blood-aqueous barrier (BAB) breakdown in eyes of diabetic patients after phacoemulsification and implantation of heparin-surface-modified poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA) or soft hydrophobic acrylic intraocular lenses (IOLs) performed using the same technique with the same incision size to determine the influence of the IOLs on postoperative inflammation independent of other surgical factors. Settings: Department of Ophthalmology, University of Paris XIII, Bobigny, France. Methods: In a prospective study, 44 eyes of 31 diabetic patients with or without mild to I moderate diabetic retinopathy were randomly assigned to receive an HSM PMMA IOL (22 eyes) or a soft hydrophobic acrylic IOL (22 eyes) after standardized phacoemulsification surgery. Both types of IOLs had a 6.0 mm optic, were inserted unfolded, and were placed in the bag through a calibered 6.0 mm superior scleral incision. Anterior chamber flare was measured preoperatively and 1, 7, 30, and 240 days postoperatively using the Kowa 500 laser Rare meter. Results: The mean flare value was higher on the first postoperative day in both groups. There were no statistically significant between-group differences in flare scores: or clinical parameters preoperatively or at any postoperative visit. II Conclusions: No significant difference was observed in inflammation between eyes having HSM PMMA IOL implantation or those having soft hydrophobic acrylic IOL implantation through the same-size incision. This indicates that hydrophobic acrylic and HSM PMMA materials induce the same degree of BAB breakdown after phacoemulsification in eyes of diabetic patients. J Cataract Refract Surg 2001; 27:855-860 (C) 2001 ASCRS and ESCRS.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据