4.6 Article

Optimization of refolding with simultaneous purification of recombinant human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor from Escherichia coli by immobilized metal ion affinity chromatography

期刊

BIOCHEMICAL ENGINEERING JOURNAL
卷 43, 期 2, 页码 197-202

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.bej.2008.09.018

关键词

Recombinant human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor; Inclusion bodies; Protein refolding and purification; Immobilized metal ion affinity chromatography; Protein folding liquid chromatography

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation in China [20705028]
  2. Foundation of Key Laboratory of Modern Separation Science in Shaanxi Province [4005JS61]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Immobilized metal ion affinity chromatography (IMAC) is a new technique for protein refolding, but it is limited to the refolding of fusion proteins with histidine affinity tags. In the present work, a non-fusion recombinant protein, recombinant human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (rhG-CSF) expressed in Escheriachia coli (E. coli) in the form of inclusion bodies was successfully refolded with simultaneous purification by IMAC. rhG-CSF inclusion bodies solubilized in 8.0 mol/L urea was injected into a CU(II)-iminodiacetic acid (IDA)-IMAC column, the soluble and active form of rhG-CSF in aqueous solution was obtained after desorbed from the column by linear increase of imidazole concentration. Several factors in the refolding process, including urea concentration and pH of mobile phases, type of buffer, glycerol concentration and loading sample volume, were investigated, respectively. When 200 mu L of denatured/reduced rhG-CSF solution at a total protein concentration of 2.8 mg/mL was loaded on the IMAC column, rhG-CSF with a specific activity of 2.3 x 10(8) IU/mg and a mass recovery of 39% was obtained after IMAC refolding, and rhG-CSF was also purified during this chromatographic process, its purity was determined to be 97%. (C) 2008 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据