4.1 Article

Osmotic stimulation of the Na+/H+ exchanger NHE1:: Relationship to the activation of three MAPK pathways

期刊

JOURNAL OF MEMBRANE BIOLOGY
卷 181, 期 3, 页码 205-214

出版社

SPRINGER-VERLAG
DOI: 10.1007/s00232-001-0023-3

关键词

p42/p44 Erk; p38 MAPK/RK; SAPK/JNK; NHE; SEK1/MKK4, U937

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The Na+/H+ exchanger (NHE) becomes activated by hyperosmolar stress, thereby contributing to cell volume regulation. The signaling pathway(s) responsible for the shrinkage-induced activation of NHE, however, remain unknown. A family of mitogen-activated protein kinases (MAPK), encompassing p42/p44 Erk, p38 MAPK and SAPK, has been implicated in a variety of cellular responses to changes in osmolarity. We therefore investigated whether these kinases similarly signal the hyperosmotic activation of NHE. The time course and osmolyte concentration dependence of hypertonic activation of NHE and of the three sub-families of MAPK were compared in U937 cells. The temporal course and dependence on osmolarity of Eric and p38 MAPK activation were found to be similar to that of NHE stimulation. However, while pretreatment of U937 cells with the kinase inhibitors PD98059 and SB203580 abrogated the osmotic activation of Erk and p38 MAPK, respectively, it did not prevent the associated stimulation of NHE. Thus, Erk1/2 and/or p38 MAPK are unlikely to mediate the osmotic regulation of NHE. The kinetics of NHE activation by hyperosmolarity appeared to precede SAPK activation. In addition, hyperosmotic activation of NHE persisted in mouse embryonic fibroblasts lacking SEK1/MKK4, an upstream activator of SAPK. Moreover, shrinkage-induced activation of NHE still occurred in COS-7 cells that were transiently transfected with a dominant-negative form of SEK1/MKK4 (SEK1/MKK4-A/L) that is expected to inhibit other isoforms of SEK as well. Together, these results demonstrate that the stimulation of NHE and the activation of Erk, p38 MAPK and SAPK are parallel but independent events.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据