3.8 Article

Concentration of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) in the serum of patients with malignant bone tumors

期刊

MEDICAL AND PEDIATRIC ONCOLOGY
卷 36, 期 6, 页码 601-604

出版社

WILEY-LISS
DOI: 10.1002/mpo.1136

关键词

vascular endothelial growth factor; osteosarcoma; chondrosarcoma; Ewing sarcoma; serum concentrations

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background. Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) is recognized as an important stimulator of angiogenesis. Formation of new blood vessels by angiogenic factors occurs in many biological processes, both physiological and pathological, among others in growth of primary solid malignant tumors and metastasis. This implies that the inhibition of angiogenic factors like VEGF would result in a suppression of tumor growth and metastasis formation. The aim of the present study was to compare preoperative serum VEGF levels of patients having malignant bone tumors with healthy controls to identify serum VEGF revels as a tumor marker. Procedure. Blood sera from patients with high-grade osteosarcoma (n=17), chondrosarcoma (n=4) and Ewing sarcoma (n=6) were taken at the time of diagnosis before biopsy and compared with sera from 129 healthy persons. To measure VEGF levels in serum, a commercially available ELISA was used (Quantikine Human VEGF Immunoassay; R&D Systems). Results. The observed geometric mean VEGF levels and 95% confidence intervals are 232.0 pg ml(-1) (168.9-318.5) for patients with high-grade osteosarcoma, 325.5 pg ml(-1) (169.3-625.8) for patients with chondrosarcoma, 484.3 pg mi (284.0-826.0) for patients with Ewing sarcoma, as compared to 216.2 pg ml(-1) (192.8-242.5) for healthy individuals. Conclusions. While the sample means for the three groups of sarcoma patients were higher than the respective mean for the healthy controls, only the mean for the group with Ewing sarcoma is statistically significantly higher than the mean for the healthy controls. Despite the significant difference, VEGF levels are not suitable as a marker for Ewing sarcoma. (C) 2001 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据