4.5 Article

The neurofibromatosis 2 protein product merlin selectively binds F-actin but not G-actin, and stabilizes the filaments through a lateral association

期刊

BIOCHEMICAL JOURNAL
卷 356, 期 -, 页码 377-385

出版社

PORTLAND PRESS LTD
DOI: 10.1042/0264-6021:3560377

关键词

actin cytoskeleton; ezrin/radixin/moesin family; merlin; neurofibromatosis 2

资金

  1. NHLBI NIH HHS [HL56949] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NINDS NIH HHS [NS24279, F32-NS10699] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The neurofibromatosis 2 protein product merlin, named for its relatedness to the ezrin, radixin and moesin (ERM) family of proteins, is a tumour suppressor whose absence results in the occurrence of multiple tumours of the nervous system, particularly schwannomas and meningiomas. Merlin's similarity to ERMs suggests that it might share functions, acting as a link between cytoskeletal components and the cell membrane. The N-terminus of merlin has strong sequence identity to the N-terminal actin-binding region of ezrin; here we describe in detail the merlin-actin interaction. Employing standard actin co-sedimentation assays, we have determined that merlin isoform 2 binds F-actin with an apparent binding constant of 3.6 muM and a stoichiometry of 1 mol of merlin per 11.5 mol of actin in filaments at saturation. Further, solid-phase binding assays reveal that merlin isoforms 1 and 2 bind actin filaments differentially, suggesting that the intramolecular interactions in isoform 1 might hinder its ability to bind actin. However, merlin does not bind G-actin. Studies of actin filament dynamics show that merlin slows filament disassembly with no influence on the assembly rate, indicating that merlin binds along actin filament lengths. This conclusion is supported by electron microscopy, which demonstrates that merlin binds periodically along cytoskeletal actin filaments. Comparison of these findings with those reported for ERM proteins reveal a distinct role for merlin in actin filament dynamics.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据